AKSEPTANSI TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI KOMUNIKASI: PENDEKATAN SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY
Abstract
Social Cognitive Theory banyak dikenal sebagai teori pembelajaran, teori sikap dan perilaku. Artikel merupakan essay tentang social cognitive theory yang digunakan untuk mengamati perilaku penggunaan (akseptansi) TIK oleh pengguna (user). Beberapa penelitian melakukan pendekatan triadic reciprocal, ada yang menggunakan pendekatan skema akseptansi TIK. Makalah ini mengidentifikasikan bagaimana pendekatan Social Cognitive Theory digunakan untuk menjelaskan hubungan perilaku, sikap, motivasi dan lingkungan dalam pengambilan keputusan penggunaan TIK. Hasil indentifikasi menunjukkan bahwa terdapat dua faktor utama yang berperan dalam memahami hubungan pengaruh tersebut, yaitu self efficacy dan outcome expectation. Pemahaman kedua faktor utama tersebut perlu dibarengi dengan pemahaman perilaku TIK yang diadop. Kata kunci : social cognitive theory, akseptansi, triadic, efficacy,TIKDownloads
References
Abugabah, Ahed, Louis Sanzogni, and Arthur Poropat. 2009. “The Impact of Information Systems on User Performance : A Critical Review and Theoretical Model.†In ed. Cemal Ardil. Nathan, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia: WASET, 13. http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/handle/10072/31849.
Alajmi, Bibi M. 2012. “The Intention to Share: Psychological Investigation of Knowledge Sharing Behaviour in Online Communities.†Journal of Information & Knowledge Management 11(3): 1250012–22. 10.1142/S0219649212500220.
Bandura, Albert. 1988. “Organisational Application of Social Cognitive Theory.†Australian Journal of Management 13(2): 28.
———. 1999. “Social Cognitive Theory : An Agency Perspective.†Asian Journal of Scocial Psychology 2: 21–41.
Cara, Pauls; Jill Levine; 1997. “Theory of Reasoned Action / Theory of Planned Behavior.â€
Compeau, Deborah, Christopher A Higgins, and Sid Huff. 1999. “Social Cognitive Theory And Individual Reactions To Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study.†MIS Quarterly 23(2): 145–58. http://www.jstor.org/stable/249749 .
Compeau, Deborah R., and Christopher a. Higgins. 1995. “Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills.†Information Systems Research 6(2): 118–43. http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/isre.6.2.118.
Davis, Fred D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.†MIS Quarterly (September).
Hagemann, Harald, Bruno Amable, Martin Heidenreich, and European Studies. 2005. The New Economy in Transatlantic Perspective. 1st ed. ed. Kurt Hubner. New york: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Higgins, Christopher A. 2013. “Computer Sefl-Efficacy : Development of Measure and Initial Test.†19(2): 189–211.
Investopedia. “Five Chart Patterns You Need to Know.†http://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/neweconomy.asp.
Jr, Fred D Davis. 1985. “A Technology Acceptance Model For Empiricall Testing New End-User Information Systems : Theory and Result.â€
Kreitner, Robert, and Angelo Kinicki. 2003. Organization Behavior (terjemahan). 1st ed. Mc Graw Hill Companies Inc.
Kripanont, Napaporn. “Using a Technology Acceptance Model to Investigate Academic Acceptance of the Internet.†1(2): 13–28.
Kusluva, Salih, ed. 2003. Managing Employee Attitude and Behaviors in the Tourism and Hospitality Industry. New York: Nova Science Publisher. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=eQp1t_lHgzwC&pg=PA31&dq=triadic+reciprocal&hl=jv&sa=X&ei=7CHrVNKPIMaTuASUuoDACA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=triadic reciprocal&f=false.
Legris, Paul, John Ingham, and Pierre Collerette. 2003. “Why Do People Use Information Technology? A Critical Review of the Technology Acceptance Model.†Information & Management 40(3): 191–204. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378720601001434.
Mathisen, Gro Ellen, Torbjørn Torsheim, and Ståle Einarsen. 2006. “The Team-Level Model of Climate for Innovation: A Two-Level Confirmatory Factor Analysis.†Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 79(1): 23–35. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1348/096317905X52869 (February 20, 2015).
Morris, Michael G et al. 2003. “User Acceptance Of Information Technology : Toward a Unified View .†MIS Quarterly 27(3): 425–78. http://nwresearch.wikispaces.com/file/view/Venkatesh+User+Acceptance+of+Information+Technology+2003.pdf.
Nurhan Özturk, Esra Bozkurt, Tezcan Kartal, Ramazan Demir, Gülay Ekici. 1986. “Evaluation Of Prospective Science Teachers ’ Computer.†Western Anatolia journal of Educational Science: 181–88.
Oshlyansky, Lidia, Singleton Park, Paul Cairns, and Harold Thimbleby. 1904. “Validating the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology ( UTAUT ) Tool Cross-Culturally.â€
Road, Glades, and Boca Raton. “User Acceptance Of E-Commerce Technology : A Meta-Analytic Comparison Of Competing Models .†: 179–90.
Röcker, Carsten. 2009. “Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease-of-Use of Ambient Intelligence Applications in Office Environments 2 Technology Adoption.†: 1052–61.
Strong, Diane M, Mark T Dishaw, and D Brent Bandy. 2006. “Extending Task Technology Fit with Computer Self-Efficacy.†SIGMIS Database 37(2-3): 96–107. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1161345.1161358.
Taylor, Shirley, and Peter Todd. 2013. “Assessing IT Usage : The Role of Prior Experience.†19(4): 561–70.
Thompson, Ronald L et al. 2013. “Personal Computing : Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization1.†MIS Quarterly 15(1): 125–43. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/249443?uid=3738224&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=21104405804611.
Venkatesh, Viswanath. 2000. “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use : Integrating Control , Intrinsic Motivation , and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model.†Information System Research 11(4): 342–65. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=768947.
Wang, Shu-Ling, and Sunny S. J. Lin. 2007. “The Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Web-Based Learning through NetPorts.†British Journal of Educational Technology 38(4): 600–612. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00645.x (October 10, 2014).
