Filsafat Ilmu Manajemen dan Implikasi dalam Praktik

Main Article Content

Elfan Kaukab


Abstract This paper explains the development of a management practice framework with the philosophy of the social sciences as analysis approach, especially in the field of management as a basic reference. The tendency of epistemological and ontological understanding of managers will give a different perspective to the organization. This framework can be used to construct a taxonomy that is able to identify the philosophical paradigm as the basis in developing good management practices, so that managers can understand the risks that may arise in the organization due to their lack of understanding the fundamentals of philosophy in management science. Four philosophical frameworks that integrate perspectives, research methods, practices, and behaviors in management become new perspective models, i.e. naturalist-agency perspective, naturalist-structuralist perspective, hermeneutic-agency perspective, and hermeneutic-structuralist perspective. Coherent philosophical approach is necessary in the application and development of management practices.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kaukab, E. (1). Filsafat Ilmu Manajemen dan Implikasi dalam Praktik. Fokus Bisnis : Media Pengkajian Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 13(1).



Archer, M.S. 1996. “Social integration and system integration: developing the distinction”, Sociology, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 679-99.

Bhaskar, R. 1998. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences, 3rd ed., Routledge, London.

Dixon, J. 2002. Responses to Governance: Governing Corporations, Societies and the World. Praeger, Westport, CT.

Dixon, J. and Dogan, R. 2002. Hierarchies, Networks and Markets: Responses to Societal Governance Failures, Administrative Theory and Praxis. Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 175-96.

Dixon, J. and Dogan, R. 2003. A Philosophical Investigation of Corporate Governance Failure. The Journal of The Philosophy of Management, Forth Coming.

Gabriele Lakomski, Colin W. Evers, 2011, Analytic Philosophy and Organization Theory: Philosophical Problems and Scientific Solutions, Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Vol. 32 pp. 23-54

Hollis, M. 1994. The Philosophy of Social Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

John Dixon, Rhys Dogan, 2003. Corporate Decision Making: Contending Perspectives and Their Governance Implications, Corporate Governance. The International Journal of Business in Society. Vol. 3 Iss 1 pp. 39-57

Judistira, Garna K. 2006. Filsafat Ilmu. Bandung: Judistira Garna Foundation dan Primaco Akademika.

Likert, R. 1967. The Human Organization: Its Management and Value, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

Nichols, J.R. 1986. “Congruent Leadership”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal. Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 27-31.

Ricoeur, Paul. 2006. Hermeneutika Ilmu Sosial. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.

Salmon, Merrilee, John Earman, Clark Glymour, James G. Lenno, Peter Machamer, J.E. McGuire, John D. Norton, Wesley C. Salmon, Kenneth F. Schaffner. 1992. Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. USA: Prentice-Hall.

Santoso, Heri dan Listiyono Santoso. 2003. Filsafat Ilmu Sosial. Yogyakarata: Gama Media.

Susanto, Astrid S. 1976. Filsafat Komunikasi. Bandung: Bina Cipta.

Thompson, J.D. 1967. Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

Trevor H. Maddock. 1994. Three Dogmas of Materialist Pragmatism: A Critique of a Recent Attempt to Provide a Science of Educational Administration. Journal of Educational Administration. Vol. 32 Iss 4 pp. 5-27

Weber, M. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, (trans. Henderson, A.M. andParsons, T.) (originally published in 1915). Free Press, New York, NY.