Perjanjian Perdagangan Asimetri Indonesia-Eropa-Inggris Pasca Brexit

Main Article Content

M. Elfan Kaukab
Ahmad Sahide

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memperkirakan bagaimana asimetri kesepakatan antara Inggris dengan Indonesia pasca Brexit. Tinjauan literatur pada kesepakatan perdagangan internasional dilakukan dengan menelusuri data kesepakatan yang tersimpan dalam basis data Kementerian Luar Negeri Indonesia dalam periode 2010-2019. Hasil memperoleh hanya ada satu kesepakatan dagang Indonesia-Inggris yaitu terkait proyek Fourth Stage Multi-stakeholder Forestry Program (4th-MFP). Pada periode yang sama, Indonesia juga ikut serta dalam kesepakatan dagang dengan Uni Eropa bernama Voluntary Partnership Agreement – Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade (VPA-FLEGT). VPA-FLEGT asimetri dengan menguntungkan Uni Eropa sementara MFP asimetri dengan menguntungkan Indonesia. Setelah menganalisis kedua kesepakatan, ditemukan kecenderungan bahwa Inggris akan terus mendorong asimetri terjadi karena memiliki undang-undang lingkungan hidup yang ketat dan kebutuhan akan kayu yang besar. Asimetri akan mendorong Indonesia tetap dapat memasok Inggris dengan kayu yang berasal dari sumber-sumber legal pasca Brexit.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kaukab, M. E., & Sahide, A. (2020). Perjanjian Perdagangan Asimetri Indonesia-Eropa-Inggris Pasca Brexit. Fokus Bisnis : Media Pengkajian Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 19(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.32639/fokusbisnis.v19i1.415
Section
Articles

References

Adler-Nissen, R., Galpin, C., & Rosamond, B. (2017). Performing Brexit?: How a post-Brexit world is imagined outside the United Kingdom. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(3), 573–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117711092

Buhmann, K., & Nathan, I. (2012). Plentiful forests, happy people? The EU’s FLEGT approach and its impact on human rights and private forestry sustainability schemes. Nordic Environmental Law Journal, 2, 53–82.

Buongiorno, J., Johnston, C., & Zhu, S. (2017). An assessment of gains and losses from international trade in the forest sector. Forest Policy and Economics, 80, 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.04.004

Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G., & Sampson, T. (2017). A hitch-hiker’s guide to post-Brexit trade negotiations: options and principles. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(S1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx005

Dimitriu, C. (2014). Free trade and exploitation. Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofia, 62, 101–108.

Erbaugh, J., Nurrochmat, D., & Purnomo, H. (2017). Regulation, formalization, and smallholder timber production in northern Central Java, Indonesia. Agroforestry Systems, 91(5), 867–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-0037-6

Fishman, A., & Obidzinski, K. (2015). Verified Legal? Ramifications of the EU Timber Regulation and Indonesia’s Voluntary Partnership Agreement for the Legality of Indonesian Timber. International Forestry Review, 17(1), 10–19.

Garcia, F. J., Ciko, L., Gaurav, A., & Hough, K. (2015). Reforming the International Investment Regime: Lessons from International Trade Law. Journal of International Economic Law, 18, 861–892. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgv042

Gómez-Mera, L., & Barrett, B. (2012). The Political Economy of Preferential Trade Agreements: Latin America and Beyond. Latin American Politics and Society, 54(1), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2012.00147.x

Heyvaert, V., & Cavoski, A. (2017). UK Environmental Law Post Brexit. Environmental Law Network International Review, 1, 2–10.

Holmes, P., Rollo, J., & Winters, L. A. (2016). Negotiating the UK’s post ­ Brexit trade arrangements. National Institute Economic Review, 238(1), 22–30.

Indrawati. (2016). Peran Sektor Bisnis Dalam Penandatanganan Voluntary Partnership Agreement On Forest Law Enforcement Governance And Trade (VPA-FLEGT) antara Indonesia dan Uni Eropa. Global Insight Journal, 01(1), 38–54.

Jeffree, M. (2019). EU wood promotion programmes and their recognition of FLEGT.

Kementerian Luar Negeri RI. Persetujuan Kemitraan Sukarela antara Republik Indonesia dan Uni Eropa tentang Penegakan Hukum Kehutanan, Penatakelolaan, dan Perdagangan Produk Kayu ke Uni Eropa (2014).

Kementerian Luar Negeri RI. Memorandum Saling Pengertian antara Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia dan Kementerian Pertanian dan Lingkungan Hidup Republik Finlandia tentang Kerjasama Bidang Kehutanan dan Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam (2017).

Kementerian Luar Negeri RI. Surat Pengaturan Antara Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia dan Departemen Pembangunan Internasional Kerajaan Inggris Raya Mengenai Kerja Sama untuk Mendukung Perdagangan Produk Kayu yang Dipanen secara Legal dan Pengelolaan Huta (2018).

Krott, M., Bader, A., Schusser, C., Devkota, R., Maryudi, A., Giessen, L., & Aurenhammer, H. (2014). Forest Policy and Economics Actor-centred power: The driving force in decentralised community based forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 49, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.012

Martono, D. S., & Rahayu, S. (2017). Estimasi Kandungan Karbon Pohon Mahoni (Swietinea macrophylla, King) Penyusun Hutan Rakyat Bersertifikat SVLK (Sistem Verifikasi Legalitas Kayu) (Studi Kasus di PPHR Lawu Lestari Kecamatan Panekan Kabupaten Magetan). Agri-Tek: Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian, Kehutanan Dan Agroteknologi, 17(2), 36–41.

Maryudi, A. (2016). Choosing timber legality verification as a policy instrument to combat illegal logging in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 68, 99–104.

Pansera, M., & Sarkar, S. (2016). Crafting Sustainable Development Solutions?: Frugal Innovations of Grassroots Entrepreneurs. Sustainability, 8(51), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010051

Richards, M., & Hobley, M. (2016). Empowering civil society in forest policies and governance: livelihood impact assessment of EU FLEGT Voluntary Partnership Agreements. The International Forestry Review, 18(3), 345–356.

Rutt, R. L., Myers, R., Ramcilovic-Suominen, S., & Mcdermott, C. (2018). FLEGT?: Another ‘forestry fad’? Environmental Science and Policy, 89, 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.08.012

Sabastian, G. E., Yumn, A., Roshetko, J. M., Manalu, P., Martini, E., & Perdana, A. (2019). Adoption of silvicultural practices in smallholder timber and NTFPs production systems in Indonesia. Agroforestry Systems, 93(2), 607–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0155-9

Sahide, M., Maryudi, A., Supratman, & Giessen, L. (2016). Forest Policy and Economics Is Indonesia utilising its international partners? The driving forces behind Forest Management Units. Forest Policy and Economics, 69, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.04.002

Sudrajat, A., Hardjanto, & Sundawati, L. (2016). Partisipasi Petani dalam Pengelolaan Hutan Rakyat Lestari?: Kasus di Desa Cikeusal dan Desa Kananga Kabupaten Kuningan. Jurnal Silvikultur Tropika, 07(1), 8–17.

Suryatmojo, H. (2014). Recovery of Forest Soil Disturbance in the Intensive Forest Management System. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 832–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.101

Syamsu, I. F., Hardjanto, & Hero, Y. (2019). Pinjaman Tunda Tebang Hutan Rakyat: Siapa yang Mengakses? (Studi Kasus?: Hutan Rakyat di Bojonegoro). Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam Dan Lingkungan, 9(1), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.9.1.114-127

Trejo-Mathys, J. (2013). Towards a Critical Theory of the World Trade Organization?: Thinking with Rawls beyond Rawls. Constellations, 20(3), 459–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12051

Zeitlin, J., & Overdevest, C. (2019). Experimentalist Interactions: FLEGT and the Transnational Timber Legality Regime. Amsterdam. Retrieved from ttps://ssrn.com/abstract=3406065